Re: Subject too specific for mini-HOWTO?

• To: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: Subject too specific for mini-HOWTO?
• From: Hal Burgiss <[email protected]>
• Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 01:18:24 -0400
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>; from [email protected] on Sun, Aug 13, 2000 at 10:03:09PM -0700
• Mail-followup-to: Hal Burgiss <[email protected]>,[email protected]
• References: <[email protected]>
• Resent-date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 01:17:34 -0400 (EDT)
• Resent-from: [email protected]
• Resent-message-id: <sM2qo.A.FzC.nE4l5@murphy>
• Resent-sender: [email protected]
• User-agent: Mutt/1.2i

On Sun, Aug 13, 2000 at 10:03:09PM -0700, [email protected] wrote:
> 
> I'm considering writing a document that describes how to configure the 
> following:
> 
> A caching DNS server using BIND 8 . . .
 
> . . . that is connected via Ethernet to .  . .
> 
> . . . a firewall running diald and pppd . . .
> 
> . . . that itself connects (on demand) to an ISP.
> 
> Would a document on this topic be so specific to my situation that
> it would not warrant publishing? Also, much of the information
> presented would be collected from existing HOWTOs (DNS, PPP,
> Firewall, Diald, etc), and therefore, possibly redundant.

I personally would find it worthwhile. One man's opinion only ...

-- 
Hal B
 [email protected]
 [email protected]
--


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

• References:
  • Subject too specific for mini-HOWTO?
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: Subject too specific for mini-HOWTO?
• Next by Date: Feedback
• Previous by thread: Subject too specific for mini-HOWTO?
• Next by thread: Re: Subject too specific for mini-HOWTO?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread