Re: DocBook Walkthrough?

• To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: DocBook Walkthrough?
• From: jdd <[email protected]>
• Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 19:54:18 +0200
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]>
• Resent-date: Tue, 16 May 2000 14:12:45 -0400 (EDT)
• Resent-from: [email protected]
• Resent-message-id: <x55mQC.A.dz.J-YI5@murphy>
• Resent-sender: [email protected]

On mar, 16 mai 2000, [email protected] � �crit

I wonder if the documentation project could benefit
>from
>more active discussion of "What is it we're trying to do exactly?"
>rather than
>"What tools are we using (today, yesterday and tomorrow) and how do they
>work?"
>or "Which tool is best for what"
>
>

I think we work on a particular basis. Most HOWTO authors use an imm�diate
experience to help others. This can barely be planned.

The necessity effectively enphasised in your letter to have multiple
formats obliges us to keep very straight to the minimal format (linuxdoc
for example)

this is my own feeling, may be others think differently...

-- 
<http://www.dodin.net> <mailto:[email protected]>
QUI EST CET HOMME ? Aidez-moi � le retrouver
WHO'S THAT GUY ? Help me find him.
http://www.dodin.net/serge/index.html


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: DocBook Walkthrough?
    • From: [email protected]

• References:
  • Re: DocBook Walkthrough?
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: User Authentication HOWTO
• Next by Date: experimental release of linuxdoc-tools (based on sgml-tools 1.0.9)
• Previous by thread: Re: DocBook Walkthrough?
• Next by thread: Re: DocBook Walkthrough?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread