Re: HOWTO vs mini-HOWTO [was: Linux Doc Infrastructure]

• To: Morten Kjeldgaard <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: HOWTO vs mini-HOWTO [was: Linux Doc Infrastructure]
• From: Karl EICHWALDER <[email protected]>
• Date: 10 Jan 2000 21:33:19 +0100
• Cc: Kim Lester <[email protected]>, [email protected]
• In-reply-to: Morten Kjeldgaard's message of "Mon, 10 Jan 2000 19:15:13 +0100 (CET)"
• References: <[email protected]>
• Resent-cc: recipient list not shown: ;
• Resent-date: 11 Jan 2000 04:55:09 -0000
• Resent-from: [email protected]
• Resent-message-id: <f8QOx.A.0PC.sere4@murphy>
• Resent-sender: [email protected]
• Sender: [email protected]
• User-agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.5

Morten Kjeldgaard <[email protected]> writes:

|     <!-- Group: software/configuration --> 
|     <!-- Keywords: sendmail:mail:e-mail:Internet Connectivity: --> 

There's no need to misuse comments for this info.  If the linuxdoc or
the DocBook markup don't fit, extent or customize the DTD: add some more
elements or attributes.  The way regular XML software will be able to
work on those documents and to evaluate the info.

-- 
work    : [email protected]                          |
        : http://www.suse.de/~ke/             |       ------    ,__o
personal: [email protected]                   |      ------   _-\_<,
        : http://www.franken.de/users/gnu/ke/ |     ------   (*)/'(*)


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

• References:
  • Re: HOWTO vs mini-HOWTO [was: Linux Doc Infrastructure]
    • From: Morten Kjeldgaard <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Open Document Environment (ODE)
• Next by Date: Re: Critique of draft GNU Free Documentation License v1.0
• Previous by thread: Re: HOWTO vs mini-HOWTO [was: Linux Doc Infrastructure]
• Next by thread: Re: HOWTO vs mini-HOWTO [was: Linux Doc Infrastructure]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread