[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: alternative sgmltools?

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: alternative sgmltools?
From: Mark Komarinski <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 14:45:19 -0500
Cc: Gerard Beekmans <[email protected]>, [email protected]
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9912222132090.583-100000@bastion.hugo.vanderkooij.org>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Resent-cc: recipient list not shown: ;
Resent-date: 22 Dec 1999 19:45:28 -0000
Resent-from: [email protected]
Resent-message-id: <d7Xj2B.A.mq.YpSY4@murphy>
Resent-sender: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]

Is there a reason for this?  Having one tool that supports both LD and DB
will be quite helpful.

-Mark

[email protected] wrote:
> 
> However sgmltools (v2) does not work with Linuxdoc but requires DocBook
> SGML sources.
> 
> Hugo.

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Carlo Gavazzi IPC     | Mark F. Komarinski, RHCE - Compat. Engineer|
176 Second Ave        | [email protected] - www.cgipc.com            |
Waltham, MA 02451 USA | Ph: 781-290-4800 x138  Fx: 781-290-4810    |


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: alternative sgmltools?
  - From: [email protected]

References:
- Re: alternative sgmltools?
  - From: [email protected]

Prev by Date: Re: alternative sgmltools?
Next by Date: Re: alternative sgmltools?
Previous by thread: Re: alternative sgmltools?
Next by thread: Re: alternative sgmltools?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread