Re: LDP License (full text)

• To: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: LDP License (full text)
• From: Adam Di Carlo <[email protected]>
• Date: 08 Oct 1999 15:31:41 -0400
• In-reply-to: [email protected]'s message of "Thu, 30 Sep 1999 23:00:03 -0700"
• References: <[email protected]>
• Resent-cc: recipient list not shown: ;
• Resent-date: 8 Oct 1999 19:31:27 -0000
• Resent-from: [email protected]
• Resent-message-id: <je45TD.A._x.Pak_3@murphy>
• Resent-sender: [email protected]
• Sender: [email protected]
• User-agent: Gnus/5.070096 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.96) Emacs/20.3

Regarding the LDP license, speaking informally as a Debian person, it
looks quite good to me (i.e., DFSG free)

Do you mind if I kick it over to <[email protected]> for
comment?

FYI, I know that licensing issues are exhausting, but I'm glad to see
you guys are toughing it out and getting it done.  

-- 
.....Adam Di [email protected].....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

• References:
  • LDP License (full text)
    • From: [email protected] (David Lawyer)

• Prev by Date: Re: Removal of HOWTOs
• Next by Date: Re: Draft Bolierplate License
• Previous by thread: A restrictive(?) LDP License
• Next by thread: Re: LDP License (full text)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread