Re: Treatment (Was Re: Debian Doc Project and LDP)

• To: C Polisher <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Treatment (Was Re: Debian Doc Project and LDP)
• From: Adam Di Carlo <[email protected]>
• Date: 26 Sep 1999 15:53:45 -0400
• Cc: [email protected]
• In-reply-to: C Polisher's message of "Sun, 26 Sep 1999 11:47:41 -0700"
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
• Resent-cc: recipient list not shown: ;
• Resent-date: 26 Sep 1999 19:53:35 -0000
• Resent-from: [email protected]
• Resent-message-id: <b0kjH.A.eiF._mn73@murphy>
• Resent-sender: [email protected]
• Sender: [email protected]
• User-agent: Gnus/5.070096 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.96) Emacs/20.3

C Polisher <[email protected]> writes:

> When informational items are classified by 
> _treatment_, searchers can quickly locate 
> desired information. Treatment would be an 
> element explaining the type of coverage 
> that the material provides, picked from a
> list. 

Very interesting idea.  I wonder how it would fit in with the DC
entity set.

BTW, anyone know some good RDF and DC mail lists to subscribe to?

--
.....Adam Di [email protected].....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Treatment (Was Re: Debian Doc Project and LDP)
    • From: C Polisher <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Debian Doc Project and LDP -- hail and well-met
    • From: Adam Di Carlo <[email protected]>
  • Treatment (Was Re: Debian Doc Project and LDP)
    • From: C Polisher <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: why sgmltools being unmaintained isn't so much of a problem
• Next by Date: Re: Treatment (Was Re: Debian Doc Project and LDP)
• Previous by thread: Treatment (Was Re: Debian Doc Project and LDP)
• Next by thread: Re: Treatment (Was Re: Debian Doc Project and LDP)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread