Re: Translations (to English?)

• To: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: Translations (to English?)
• From: Tim <[email protected]>
• Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 09:13:45 -0500 (CDT)
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• Resent-cc: recipient list not shown: ;
• Resent-date: 13 Sep 1999 14:27:28 -0000
• Resent-from: [email protected]
• Resent-message-id: <J3sUh.A.GY.PnQ33@murphy>
• Resent-sender: [email protected]

> 	Should the translation effort not already be directed toward
> having all LDP docs in all languages?  If not this should be a goal in my
> view.  Transparent language use of the LDP is a must for a global
> information source and no particular language (eg US English) should be
> placed above another except for contingent reasons.
I couldn't agree more, but I don't recall ever seeing this issue brought
up.  Only translations *from* English.

Best Regards,
Tim

--
Linux HOWTO coordinator http://metalab.unc.edu/LDP/HOWTO
[email protected], [email protected] (HOWTO's)
[email protected] (Home)
[email protected] (Work)
http://wallybox.cei.net:5119/cgi-bin/pageme.cgi (Alpha Pager)

                                D I P C
   The system that enables you to write distributed programs.......the
   easy way!
                        http://wallybox.cei.net/dipc/


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Translations (to English?)
    • From: P Jenner <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: Translations (to English?)
    • From: P Jenner <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: No "bugs" link on linuxdoc.org
• Next by Date: Re: Translations (to English?)
• Previous by thread: Re: Translations (to English?)
• Next by thread: Re: Translations (to English?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread